pdf filter sensitivity |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
dcook ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 31 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 174 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 15 August 2007 at 10:06pm |
What adjustments can I make to lower and raise the sensitivity of the pdf image filter? Mine is a bit too sensitive for some customers so I want to split the difference. Dwight
|
|
Dwight
www.vividmix.com |
|
![]() |
|
Desperado ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dwight,
It uses the same settings as the normal image scanning.
|
|
The Desperado
Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4105 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dwight,
Let me mention one more setting. You could try to decrease the value in the following entry in the SpamFilter.ini file: SpamPDFMaxPixelHeight=1800 to something like 500 or 600. It will catch less spam, but may reduce the number of false positives. |
|
![]() |
|
dcook ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 31 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 174 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I appreciate the reply
Edited by dcook - 16 August 2007 at 12:25pm |
|
Dwight
www.vividmix.com |
|
![]() |
|
dcook ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 31 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 174 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
thanks, what settings do you use for images? I may be too sensitive at 14.
|
|
Dwight
www.vividmix.com |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.250 seconds.