ISA Server Can't Redirect Ports - Help |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
NJTackle
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: ISA Server Can't Redirect Ports - HelpPosted: 07 January 2004 at 8:20am |
|
I'm running Exchange 2000 behind ISA Server (Firewall). Exchange is being published as a internal server on ISA. All SMTP mail comes in through the ISA server and gets forwarded to the Exchange server. Problem is ISA does not have the ability to redirect traffic to another port (i.e. port 26). So, the scenario of having SPAMFilter listening on port 26 and then forwarding to port 25 of the mail server isn't possible. Currently, I've gotten this setup to work with changing my server to port 26 and then SPAMFilter to port 25, but my forum boards that automatically send SMTP traffic to port 25 get stuck going through SPAMFilter, which you don't want (SPAMFilter shouldn't control outgoing mail). The result - an error message saying RELAY e-mail not permitted (or something like that). I guess this is because I have relay turned off on Exchange which I do NOT want to enable. Any ideas on how to permit SPAMFilter to relay outgoing e-mail through itself? Thanks in advance! NJT |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat
Admin Group
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 January 2004 at 12:10am |
|
NJT, SpamFilter is designed purposely not to being able to relay anywhere except to your own destination SMTP server. This was to avoid having it become an open relay and thus a source of Spam. It is also designed to handle incoming traffic only, not outgoing. Outgoing email should still be processed by your SMTP server. This said, there are a couple of options that should work in your environment. 1st, if ISA can't perform port translation, you can configure SpamFilter to listen on port 25 of a different IP than your server. ISA forwards emails to SpamFilter on port 25, SpamFilter then forwards traffic to your Exchange also on port 25. I believe this is the simplest option since you do not need to change your Exchange IP or port, you're simply configuring ISA to forward to SpamFilter's IP rather than Exchange's. Furthermore all your outgoing traffic will still be handled by Exchage, rather than by SpamFilter. If somehow that is not an option, you can add to SpamFilter's IP whitelist your internal class C of IPs, so that all your internal users will be able to bypass all blocking rules and will be able to relay. Roberto F. |
|
![]() |
|
eric
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 January 2004 at 5:39am |
|
//you can add to SpamFilter's IP whitelist your internal class C of IPs, so that all your internal users will be able to bypass all blocking rules and will be able to relay// don`t !
we had some lame isa server also. just buy a router, isa isn`t good. if you put your whole cnet inplace in logsat, some annoying spambot will try to : mailfrom: nobody@yourip or nobody@[yourip] because logsat will bypass all rules, and you have two way traffic in place... this will case the listme@yourip also to work, causing a possible blacklist. logsat and isa is dangerous, isa rewrites packets, and always does nat on the internal interface... (we name that the infernal interface from isa)
however, if you set the gateway from your exchange server to the isa server, it can sent mail trough the nat-table of the isa server. it is also possible to run logsat ON the isa server itself, and bind the socket to 127.0.0.1, and publish the interface with isa
|
|
![]() |
|
Richard
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 January 2004 at 1:00pm |
|
What I've done, is use a second NIC (with a second IP address). All email traffic coming in is pointed to that IP, the SF is only bound to that IP. Then if it is an acceptable email, it forwards to the first NIC/IP. No changing of ports involved. The only gotcha, is that I have to bind SF before I bind my regular email services, otherwise it (sendmail NT) will bind to all IPs and not allow SF to bind to any.
|
|
![]() |
|
Josh Garrett
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 February 2004 at 10:46pm |
|
The problem is not that isa cant forward the port....it is that your default smtp connector within exchange is listening on both ethernet interfaces. You need to do these things. 1. Create a protocol rule in ISA to enable all 25 traffic. 2. In exchange manager go to the the smtp connectors properties. Set the smtp connector to only listen on the INSIDE interface. That will stop it from picking up 25 traffic on the outside interface. 3. Create a server publishing rule in ISA to redirect all 25 traffic to the ip address of the spamfilter 4. Stop and Restart the smtp connector. Stop and Restart ISA services.
Let me know if you have any problems. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.158 seconds.


Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)


