Idea-Possible future add in? |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
IKILLSPAM1
Groupie
Joined: 02 May 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Idea-Possible future add in?Posted: 01 June 2007 at 9:42pm |
|
We already have the following options in our spamfilter.ini, whats below is what I have in mine. Anyways, why not add more to this. If multiple IPs in the same class C end up in the limboblacklistcache, why not give us the option to autoblacklist the whole class c after a customizable number of IPs appear from that class c. So for example, 3 IPs in my limbo are all on the same class C. take it and auto blacklist the whole class C automatically to the IP blacklist. Also what about adding permanent abilities to the already available options below? If a certain IP sends X number of spams add his IP to the IP blacklist. This would have to be a higher number as you dont want to end up with a boat load of IPs. Well just some ideas. Maybe someones already had them Im not sure. THoughts??? ;If an IP sends more than a certain number of spams during this number of minutes then it is temporarily banned (blacklisted) ;If an IP address was banned because it sent too many spams in a certain time interval, it will be un-banned after this number of minutes |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat
Admin Group
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 June 2007 at 1:15pm |
|
The idea is a good one. Do you have cases where this has happened, meaning an IP gets blacklisted in the cache, but then they resort to sending more emails from a different IP within the same class C? We've not seen a lot of this happening, however should spammers start to do this, again, the idea is very good.
|
|
![]() |
|
WebGuyz
Senior Member
Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 348 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 June 2007 at 4:10pm |
|
We haven't seen this as an issue, but everyones spam situation is different. If implemented it should be able to be turned on/off in ini settings.
|
|
|
http://www.webguyz.net
|
|
![]() |
|
Desperado
Senior Member
Joined: 27 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 June 2007 at 7:40pm |
|
We *do* see this but are semi-afraid that aol or hotmail will get blocked more than they are now. That is 2 issues however. Comments? |
|
|
The Desperado
Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
|
![]() |
|
IKILLSPAM1
Groupie
Joined: 02 May 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 June 2007 at 11:21am |
|
Yes Roberto, I actually monitor from time to time the blacklist limbo and if I see multiple ip's from same class c I paste it into notepad, change the last octet to .0 and then paste it into the IP blacklist in SFI. On a seperate note, IPs Ive added to the IP Blacklist file dont appear to be blocked, well I say that because there are IPs in the limbo cache which are in a class c I have blocked in the IP blacklist. So it appears that IP blacklist isnt working for me, otherwise I wouldnt be seeing them in limbo correct? |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.


Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)


