SFDC filter too aggressive |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
Simone 
Groupie 
Joined: 06 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 42 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: SFDC filter too aggressivePosted: 19 February 2008 at 10:16am |
|
I'm having problems with SFDC filter that is too aggressive, i'm using 15 as network reliability, which number are you using?
With 15 it is stopping always email with only subject and attachment... Do you have the same problem? |
|
 |
|
|
jerbo128
Senior Member 
Joined: 06 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2008 at 2:36pm |
|
I am having the same issues with emails that have a blank body. Regardless of attachment or not.
Jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
Simone
Groupie
Joined: 06 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 42 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 4:09am |
|
I don't think this is the problem but which network reliability are you using?
|
|
|
|
|
jerbo128
Senior Member
Joined: 06 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 9:18am |
|
My SFDC is set at 2. But I think Logsat overrides that with a much higher number.
I don't think that it is an issue with being too aggressive, but rather that SFDC seems to classify all emails with an empty body as the same. I would like to see something that allows you to exclude those with an empty body, or just have the filter ignore them all together.
Jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
Simone
Groupie
Joined: 06 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 42 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 February 2008 at 12:57pm |
|
Hi roberto,
any news about this issue? My SFDC network reliability is 25 now but the problem is going on.... |
|
|
|
|
davemeister
Newbie 
Joined: 11 March 2008 Location: Portland, OR Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 March 2008 at 2:17am |
|
Keep raising it if it is not to your liking. Remember the "number" indicates the number of spamfilter "builds" that report the abuse to the SFDC. A number of 2 is prob too low. 15 I am finding is low as well. I've pumped mine up to 25. We'll see how it does. The more spamfilter builds out there, the higher the number should be if you want to trim that particular filter down.
You could always disable it as well. I've notice that the Greylist takes care of most of the junk and you may have no need for the SFDC. Just depends. I think you still want to use it though as it helps Logsat build a more effective SFDC.
Am I correct Roberto? :-)
|
|
|
Davemeister
-Death to Spammers! |
|
|
|
Topic Options|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.