Why haven't I seen anything blocked by Bayesian Filter? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
benny ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 14 December 2004 at 11:17am |
corpus.ini [Messages]
|
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4105 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Benny,Please see http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/showmessage.asp?messageID=4620 for an explanation.Roberto F.
LogSat Software
|
|
![]() |
|
ktrunkett ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 07 February 2005 Status: Offline Points: 30 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
my corpus is: [Messages] I've only seen 4 emails get caught by the Bayesian filter, and they were all false positives. |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4105 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kriss,
In average spam messages are 5-20 times more that good messages. Our own corpus.ini file looks like this:[Messages]
Spam=9105146
Good=559984We receive 20x more spam than good emails. Still, under these conditions, during the past 3 days we blocked 100,000 emails using MAPS filter, 90,000 using blacklisted countries, and only 1,000 using Bayesian filtering.Being in yours and Benny's case spam and clean counts so close, it may be hard for the statistical filter to accurately determine what is spam and what is not. If you wish we can try emailing you our own corpus database to see if it makes a difference.Roberto F.
LogSat Software
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.199 seconds.