Sender Authorize |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Jasone
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Sender AuthorizePosted: 10 July 2006 at 4:01pm |
|
We are getting customers that are requesting a spam function
that allows them to authorize senders. For example someone sends an email
to the spam gateway and if they are not part of an authorized sender list then
it will send them back an email to authorize them. If they click on the
link in the authorize email then it will add them to the list and then forward
the email. |
|
![]() |
|
Jasone
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 July 2006 at 1:25pm |
|
Anyone? I sent an email to support on this as well and no answer.
|
|
![]() |
|
WebGuyz
Senior Member
Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 348 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 July 2006 at 3:12pm |
|
If you want my opinion challenge response causes more problems then it fixes by generating more sensless traffic to spam that probably has an invalid return address. You also have the problem of someone's address being 'joe jobbed' and that person has an autporsponder on their account so when a challenge is sent it gets stuck in a loop between the. Also most ecommerce sites send invoices or utilities or cc companies send you statements and if you don't whitelist them ahead of time you never get them because they use a noreply user and have no idea that bill or statement never got thru. With SF the spam is rejected immediately without ndr's cluttering up the whole internet (true if you use AuthorizedTo list). You can check the quarantine db once a day and whitelist any false positives and they are whitelisted forever.
My $0.02
|
|
|
http://www.webguyz.net
|
|
![]() |
|
LogSat
Admin Group
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 July 2006 at 4:20pm |
|
Jasone,
There are currently no plans to implement this functionality. |
|
![]() |
|
Desperado
Senior Member
Joined: 27 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 July 2006 at 12:44pm |
|
Jason, As WebGuyz states above, my observations are that it is a very real problem. It actually can cause such high traffic and queuing volume that we, as an ISP, have a policy prohibiting our customers from using their own versions of sender authentication or even gray listing. At the ISP level, where we queue for up to 5 days, the issue becomes very problematic. Should LogSat decide to add a feature like that, any user with high volume will certainly be turning it off in short order.
My 3 cents!
|
|
|
The Desperado
Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
|
![]() |
|
Jasone
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 July 2006 at 10:36pm |
|
Thank you for the insight.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.258 seconds.


Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)


