Bug? |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
kspare
Senior Member
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Bug?Posted: 23 November 2005 at 9:39am |
|
I noticed this morning that if an IP is whitelisted it also bypasses the connection limit. IE, I limit 10 connections per ip, but if an ip is whitelisted it can have unlimited? Is this meant to be like this? |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat
Admin Group
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 November 2005 at 10:16am |
|
That is by design. Whitelisting does just that, bypass *all* of SpamFilter rules. The only exception is the antivirus filter.
|
|
![]() |
|
kspare
Senior Member
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 November 2005 at 10:19am |
|
anyway to not bypass the connection limit rule? I don't see why you would want this?
|
|
![]() |
|
LogSat
Admin Group
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 November 2005 at 7:25am |
|
No, currently that is not possible. The whitelist was created as
certain domains/users do not want to have their email filtered. If we
were to "skip" that specific rule for the whitelist, there will be
*many* more admins who'd want it back as they'll have angry customers
who now won't be able to receive large emails. That would also open the
way to generate more requests to bypass other filters as well, and
would make things rather confusing as there will be some filters to
which the whitelist applies and others where it won't.
The only solution will be to allow further customizations to the filters, and we're working on that... |
|
![]() |
|
kspare
Senior Member
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 November 2005 at 10:18am |
|
ya lost me there, how does the connection limits rules affect receiving large emails?
|
|
![]() |
|
kspare
Senior Member
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 November 2005 at 10:21am |
|
My whole point here is in the configuration panel I have it set for max connections per ip set to 10. Just because an ip is whitelisted doesn't mean it should be allowed to exceed the max allowed connections. I've had to whitelist some large isps in my area because of alot of the emails we recieve, so does this mean that they will exceed the max connections limit? That doesn't make any sense. Trusted or not, I only want 10 connections per ip. It's kind of defeating the rule.... |
|
![]() |
|
Marco
Senior Member
Joined: 07 June 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 137 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 3:32am |
|
I think Roberto means that large emails take time to finish, taking up more connections when concurrent mails are beeing sent by same source ip. Question is: which conn gets dropped when the limit is reached? the last one in, or the one that was open the longest. If the longest open connection gets dropped then you'd have problems sending large attachments.
|
|
|
Anyone who is capable of getting himself made president, should on no account be allowed to do the job. D.Adams
|
|
![]() |
|
LogSat
Admin Group
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 11:17am |
|
I was actually mistaken and talked about the wrong filter (max message size instead of the max connection limit). However the reply still stands. The whitelist will overwrite everything except the anti-virus filter. The reasoning is the same. Admins may have a connection limit set, but for example may not want to impose that limit to their secondary MX server, or their customer's SMTP server. In any case, if we were to impose the connection limit on whitelisted IPs as well, we'd always have customers who would then say "my whitelist is supposed to bypass all filters, why are certain filters not affected by it?" Again, the only solution will be to have more flexibility in the filtering rules. |
|
![]() |
|
kspare
Senior Member
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 November 2005 at 1:15am |
|
Since when is a connection limit a filter? If this will be resolved in an upcoming release that will allow us to edit how our filters work I guess it's not big deal. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.391 seconds.


Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)


