Request: Greylisting |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
WebGuyz 
Senior Member 
Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 348 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Request: GreylistingPosted: 22 June 2005 at 12:11pm |
|
http://www.webguyz.net
|
|
 |
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group 
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 June 2005 at 4:56pm |
|
We've added the request to the wishlist. While we do not have ETAs on
if/when it will be implemented, it does look like a promising filter!
|
|
|
|
|
WebGuyz
Senior Member
Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 348 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 June 2005 at 12:59am |
|
Whats impressive about the results I've read on the 'net about greylisting is that it takes a large load off of the server. Since most spammers just attempt once, you save the CPU cycles of having to run the whole gamut of tests for these fire & forget spammers. My poor servers get beat up day and night and it would be great to take some of the load of. Thanks for considering this!! |
|
|
http://www.webguyz.net
|
|
|
|
|
kspare
Senior Member
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 June 2005 at 8:47pm |
|
I can see how that would drop alot of mail, however, I do have some spammers who hit my servers for some rules even though I don't have a single 4xx rule, and they will keep sending allllllll dayyyyy long.
|
|
|
|
Topic Options|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.328 seconds.