Error when primary DNS in spamfilter is down |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
sirrar
Groupie
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 44 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Error when primary DNS in spamfilter is downPosted: 25 January 2005 at 5:47am |
|
Hi I've found out to define a secondary DNS server in spamfilter. Problems is, when it should use the secondary server (when primary is down) I get a socket error instead of lookups. This results in than all domains has invalid MX records and therefore are rejected. Im running Spamfilter 2.1.2.402 Registered on a Windows 2003 server, any ideas? The primary DNS server is a Windows 2003 DNS server located at same machine as spamfilter. This is a output from the logfiles, when primary server is down. My server are able to lookup adresses from the secondary server. 01-17-05 08:16:03:923 -- (1724) Connection from: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - Originating country : United States Best regards... Torsten Christiansen |
|
![]() |
|
sirrar
Groupie
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 44 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 January 2005 at 6:11am |
|
Hi again
Made some debugging. Tried to put in an invalid primary server. Then spamfilter does as it should do. Says the server is down and will rotate to next DNS. When my normal prim DNS is primary DNS in spamfilter is stopped (DNS server service is stopped) it gives me the socket error i wrote about in the last mail. So I think the problem is that Spamfilter has problems recognizing DNS server down when used against at Windows 2003 DNS server?? Any ideas?
Best regards... Torsten Christiansen |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat
Admin Group
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 January 2005 at 8:40pm |
|
Torsten,
Can you please check to see if when you stpo the DNS service in Windows 2003, the DNS port 53 is actually shut off and Windows is not listening on it? You can verify this by issuing from a DOS prompt: telnet aa.bb.cc.dd 53 if a connection is established, then Windows is not really releasing the DNS port and SpamFilter may be getting "confused" as to if DNS is available or not, and we may need to investigate on what is really happening. |
|
![]() |
|
sirrar
Groupie
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 44 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 January 2005 at 9:34am |
|
hi again just tried to stop the DNS server and made a telnet to the dns server (same machine as spamfilter is installed on.) It looks like windows 2003 is actually releasing the port. Output from the test: telnet 192.168.1.2 53 192.168.1.2 is set to primary DNS server in spamfilter Edited by sirrar |
|
|
Best regards...
Torsten Egebirk MCTIP: EA/SA - MCSE - MCSA - CCA - CCNA |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat
Admin Group
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 January 2005 at 12:20am |
|
Torsten,
You were absolutely correct, we were able to duplicate the problem now. I believe we fixed it, and a pre-release patch is available in build 2.1.2.403 which we have just uploaded in the registered user area of the website. If you'd like to try it, please let us know if it fixes the problem in your environment as well. |
|
![]() |
|
sirrar
Groupie
Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 44 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 January 2005 at 12:57am |
|
Hi again
Just put in 403. Shut down the DNS service, and now Spamfilter is rotating to next DNS. Problem solved. Thankyou very much |
|
|
Best regards...
Torsten Egebirk MCTIP: EA/SA - MCSE - MCSA - CCA - CCNA |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.273 seconds.


Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)


