Matt,
The concern about SpamFilter getting "fatter" is a legitimate concern, but in this situation, there's nothing to worry about. Roberto has already said that this capability will be added as a plug-in feature -- an optional feature for SpamFilter, not something that is going to bulk-up the code base, slow down the application or make all SpamFilter users pay for a feature that only a subset of SpamFilter users will want.
Personally, I'm looking forward to the eventual release of this capability. I am currently using an older (unsatisfactory) mail filtering solution in series behind SpamFilter, but have turned-off everything but the antivirus it provides (because antivirus is just about the only thing that works reliably on this filtering solution). I am *definitely* going to replace it with something else. As a customer of LogSat for nearly two years, I have come to trust the reliability of their product and the fairness of their pricing policy, and would give them the "first shot" at selling me a replacement solution. If I can incorporate antivirus into SpamFilter, I could completely eliminate this old filtering software, and the server it is running on.
And if LogSat comes up with a way to let users like me (and many other users who have asked for antivirus) install it as a plug-in, but not force other users to install and/or pay for something that they don't want or need, then it becomes a win-win situation for every one of us.
Jim
|