AutoForce List
Printed From: LogSat Software
Category: Spam Filter ISP
Forum Name: Spam Filter ISP Support
Forum Description: General support for Spam Filter ISP
URL: https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5222
Printed Date: 02 July 2025 at 6:32am
Topic: AutoForce List
Posted By: Desperado
Subject: AutoForce List
Date Posted: 13 June 2005 at 4:02pm
|
2 Questions really.
1. Is there a limit (length) for an entry AND
2. Can we come up with a way to NOT enter the ridiculous entries?
The example below is one that has no use AND it seems to have gotten truncated just before the "pipe" Ignore the word wrap.
mailto:newsletter-biotech_story_type_html-return-probe-1118670957.jgcojjdhfbmjbcimdjmf-andyz=saeventures.coandyz@saeventures.com - newsletter-biotech_story_type_html-return-probe-1118670957.j gcojjdhfbmjbcimdjmf-andyz=saeventures.co|andyz@saeventures.c om
Regards, ------------- The Desperado Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
Replies:
Posted By: bpogue99
Date Posted: 13 June 2005 at 4:15pm
|
1. I am sure there is, but I haven't found it 2. Wow would that be nice. |
I spend a few hours a month cleaning out the auto-whitelist at various customers since I find all kinds of junk in the list due to bad mail practices.Posted By: Desperado
Date Posted: 13 June 2005 at 4:28pm
|
Yes ... I too, spend time cleaning the lists up. So far, I have not been able to write a good script algorithm to do the job for me. Regards, ------------- The Desperado Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
Posted By: LogSat
Date Posted: 13 June 2005 at 7:13pm
|
There should not be a limit on the length, and we don't really want to
prevent those entries from being stored based on length, as some
mailing lists do use these long names...
------------- Roberto Franceschetti http://www.logsat.com" rel="nofollow - LogSat Software http://www.logsat.com/sfi-spam-filter.asp" rel="nofollow - Spam Filter ISP |
Posted By: kspare
Date Posted: 14 June 2005 at 10:06am
|
But those long emails are usually a generated email with random characters, so it really has no use in the autowhitelist. How hard would it be to add a function so on the web you could have one tick to either not add it to the whitelist or to add it to the whitelist? |
Posted By: Desperado
Date Posted: 14 June 2005 at 10:51am
|
Here is a thought ... how about (and I do this with a perl script now) if the "left Part" of an address is longer than "x", replace it with an "*"? Also, and now I am really pushing the envelope, how about a totaly separate log to log additions to the AutoAllow so I do not have to constantly look for the "added" entry in the main log file? OR ... you could just ignore all my stupid ideas! Regards, ------------- The Desperado Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |