<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Spam Filter ISP Forums : SpamFilter&#146;s AntiVirus - 100% CPU usage</title>
  <link>https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Spam Filter ISP Forums : Spam Filter ISP Support : SpamFilter&#146;s AntiVirus - 100% CPU usage]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 07:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:07:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 11.04</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5268</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SpamFilter&#146;s AntiVirus - 100% CPU usage :  After SpamFilter&amp;#039;s AntiVirus...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5268&amp;PID=6245&amp;title=spamfilters-antivirus-100-cpu-usage#6245</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=2">Guests</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 5268<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 July 2005 at 4:07pm<br /><br /><P>&nbsp;</P><P>After SpamFilter's AntiVirus fond a virus&nbsp;the other day, it went to 100% usage and email flow was affected. This occured twice now. </P><P>1) Could spamfilter be setup to use McAfee commandline scanners? most&nbsp;most of our domain&nbsp;get DAT update files at no extra charge. </P><P>2) This Norman stuff is not very good. reserching many point of views,&nbsp;reported most folks are not happy about how little effective it is in stopping macro viruses.&nbsp;Norman focus on sandbox-2 technologies, but that's all for binary viruses that most folks stop via attachment blocking any ways.... </P><P>Any comments or suggestions?</P><P>Alex</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>consumes so much CPU - SpamFilter's AntiVirus</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5268&amp;PID=6245&amp;title=spamfilters-antivirus-100-cpu-usage#6245</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>