Spam Filter ISP Forums : any ideas? https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/ Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:35:17 +0000 Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:12:00 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 11.04 360 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2169 <![CDATA[Spam Filter ISP Forums]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/ <![CDATA[any ideas? : Vinh, The free version 1.2.0.178...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2223&title=any-ideas#2223 Author: LogSat
Subject: 2169
Posted: 15 October 2003 at 1:12am

Vinh,

The free version 1.2.0.178 has some bugs that have been fixed in later releases available to licensed users only. If the beta solved your performance issues, most likely the licensed version will work fine.

The beta build is not crippled in any way, but it will expire and stop working in a few weeks. Being a beta, it has several issues that will be addressed before it's released to commercial/licensed status.

Roberto F.
LogSat Software

]]> Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:12:00 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2223&title=any-ideas#2223 <![CDATA[any ideas? : Thanks for the all the responses...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2197&title=any-ideas#2197 Author: Guests
Subject: 2169
Posted: 13 October 2003 at 7:31pm

Thanks for the all the responses Dan.  I agree that the RFC strongly suggest a proper bounce response, but knowing how malicous internet users could be.  I like to keep it low key, and let the spammers think they got their messages off.  Thanks again.

 

V

]]> Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:31:00 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2197&title=any-ideas#2197 <![CDATA[any ideas? : vinh, Actually, RFC STRONGLY...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2196&title=any-ideas#2196 Author: Desperado
Subject: 2169
Posted: 13 October 2003 at 7:14pm

vinh,

Actually, RFC STRONGLY suggests a proper bounce response .... however if you place a single dot in the custom messages, they will get a bounce but with no usefull information.

Dan S.

 

]]> Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:14:00 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2196&title=any-ideas#2196 <![CDATA[any ideas? : It&#039;s actually my bad, I cleared...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2195&title=any-ideas#2195 Author: Guests
Subject: 2169
Posted: 13 October 2003 at 6:48pm

It's actually my bad, I cleared everything under the Customized Items.  Once I restored, it everything in the Black/White Lists worked great.  My theory behind clearing all the reponses in the Customized Items is that I don't want the senders to know that they are getting blocked.  Is there way I could accomplish this, thanks.

 

V

]]> Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:48:00 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2195&title=any-ideas#2195 <![CDATA[any ideas? : vinh, First ... please understand...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2193&title=any-ideas#2193 Author: Desperado
Subject: 2169
Posted: 13 October 2003 at 3:20pm

vinh,

First ... please understand that I am also a "User" and not part of LogSat.

Having said that, I have had all my lists working in the Bets Version so I am not sure what your problem may be.

Dan S.

 

]]> Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:20:00 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2193&title=any-ideas#2193 <![CDATA[any ideas? : No, there is barely any CPU usage...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2192&title=any-ideas#2192 Author: Guests
Subject: 2169
Posted: 13 October 2003 at 2:46pm

No, there is barely any CPU usage when it hangs.  I solved the problem after installing your beta release(v.2.0.0.234).  However, nothing seems to be working in the blacklist except for keywords filter.  Would really like to use From\To features, is the beta crippled in anyway?  I installed the beta version over the eval version.  Could that be the problem?  Thanks.

]]> Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:46:00 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2192&title=any-ideas#2192 <![CDATA[any ideas? : Vinh, When it hangs, is the CPU...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2184&title=any-ideas#2184 Author: Desperado
Subject: 2169
Posted: 12 October 2003 at 2:55am

Vinh,

When it hangs, is the CPU railed at 100% ?   Can you update to the latest build?

Dan S.

 

]]> Sun, 12 Oct 2003 02:55:00 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2184&title=any-ideas#2184 <![CDATA[any ideas? : To whom it may concern, I just...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2169&title=any-ideas#2169 Author: Guests
Subject: 2169
Posted: 09 October 2003 at 8:00pm

To whom it may concern,

I just got the SpamFilter ISP to work properly.  However just when I thought everything went smooth sailing, I hit rough waters.  Every 2 hours, the spamfilter service hangs.  It did this twice today.  To get it started again, I had to kill the program, and restart the service.(didn't have to reboot the machine).  It logs an event in the event view as follow:

Event ID 7031

The SpamFilter service terminated unexpectedly.  It had done this 2 time(s).  The following corrective action will be taken in 0 milliseconds: No action.

 

Here is my PC info:

Compaq Deskpro En PIII 733mhz 256MB

W2K Server  w/sp4 and all updates

Access 2000  w/sp3 and all updates

Mdac  2.8

SpamFilter  v1.2.0.178

Pc Anywhere  9.2

No other software is installed on this machine, a pretty clean system.  I appreciate and help.  Thanks in advance.

 

V

 

 

]]> Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:00:00 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=2169&PID=2169&title=any-ideas#2169