As of this morning, I started getting emails blocked due to the IP address of major ISP mail servers being blacklisted by various sites including dnsbl.njabl.org and spam.dnsrbl.net.  Yahoo.com mail servers, Earthlink.net mail servers and one private company who is using a bellsouth.net IP have had their IP's black listed by these two lists for some reason.

Has anyone else had this issue or is there something I am missing about these lists?

Our company as well has had this happen and I am trying to contact the blockers to have our address removed from their list.

NJABL

CLUE-ALL

NERD-ZZ

hi !!

As of this month, I started getting emails blocked due to the IP address of major ISP mail servers being blacklisted by various sites including dnsbl.njabl.org and spam.dnsrbl.net. All the outgoing mails have been blacklisted by the concerned site said at the top wat is the solution for this kind of a problem? please somebody help me to sort out.         &n bsp;  

Fred,

What time period?  I have looked for the last 24 hours and see no problems with dnsbl.njabl.org.

Regards,

Hi out there

Do anyone know an e-mail address to.

http://njabl.org/dynablock.html - http://njabl.org/dynablock.html

Best regards

Peter C mail peca@mail.dk

Peter C wrote: Hi out there Do anyone know an e-mail address to. http://njabl.org/dynablock.html - http://njabl.org/dynablock.html Best regards Peter C mail peca@mail.dk

Look here   \|/

Dynablock.njabl.org started out as a straight import of what was dynablock.easynet.nl...a very nice DNSBL of dynamic IP spaces, which the maintainer got tired of maintaining and announced would be shut down December 1, 2003. Since it no longer exists as dynablock.easynet.nl, we will be maintaining this copy ourselves, and it will, in time, diverge from what was dynablock.easynet.nl and any other DNSBLs that have imported the dynablock.easynet.nl zone data.

Since dynablock is much more inclusive/aggressive/complete than the dynamic listings in dnsbl.njabl.org, we decided not to potentially surprise lots of dnsbl.njabl.org users by importing it into dnsbl.njabl.org. Instead, it has been imported as its own sub-zone.

For compatibility with dnsbl.njabl.org, all dynablock.njabl.org listings return an A record of 127.0.0.3 and (other than the 127.0.0.3 test listing) all return the same TXT record, currently:
Dynamic/Residential IP range listed by NJABL dynablock - http://njabl.org/dynablock.html

For additions, contact help at mail.njabl.org. For removals/exceptions, contact removals at mail.njabl.org. Be sure to put the 4 byte dotted quad that you're emailing about in the subject or your message will be filtered.

Please make contact from the RIR contact email address for the IP block in question so that the authenticity of your request can more easily be verified.

Do not email asking for removal of dynablock entries unless we have incorrectly listed an IP as dynamic that is not. IPs that really are dynamic will not be removed.

If you claim your IP space is not dynamic, it will have to meet one of two conditions for removal to be considered:

• Your IP space must be reassigned via whois to show that it's "your address space".
• There must be unique (non-script-generated) rDNS for your IPs. rDNS for 1.2.3.4 of 1-2-3-4-blah.some.provider or blah-10-24-3-4.blah.some.provider do not qualify.

If neither of the above are true, and the request comes from anyone other than the ISP that owns the IP space, the request will be totally ignored.

For large blocks of static IPs that might be mistaken as dynamic, we very strongly recommend ISPs either clearly note in their RIR registration info (whois) that the space is static or do so in the in-addr.arpa (reverse) DNS. Requests for removal of space that resolves to names like adsl-10-20-30-40.some.provider are somewhat likely to be ignored, while requests for removal of space that resolves to names like adsl-10-20-30-40.static.some.provider or mail.some.domain are far more likely to be granted.

Removal requests that do not have a 4-byte dotted quad IP address or IP network in the Subject: will be ignored.

Last modified: Monday, 07-Mar-2005 13:17:15 EST