Spam Filter ISP Forums : Email retention possibility?

Spam Filter ISP Forums : Email retention possibility? https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/ Thu, 05 Mar 2026 21:21:15 +0000 Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:28:51 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 11.04 360 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5788 <![CDATA[Spam Filter ISP Forums]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/ <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : Not yet. We're currently...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=9432&title=email-retention-possibility#9432 Author: LogSat
Subject: 5788
Posted: 07 December 2006 at 2:28pm

Not yet. We're currently adding the ability to "split" incoming emails in case a recipient is whitelisted but the others are not (allowing the whitelisted ones to receive an email, while blocking it for the others). We're also adding the "splitting" of emails in case the recipients have different domains, and each domain should be forwarded to a different SMTP server. These are quite challenging upgrades, and have taken some time. We'll include them in the next beta, and after that we'll probably work on the retension.]]> Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:28:51 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=9432&title=email-retention-possibility#9432 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : *ping*, any futher developments...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=9426&title=email-retention-possibility#9426 Author: JeffHildebrand
Subject: 5788
Posted: 07 December 2006 at 10:18am

*ping*, any futher developments along implementing an email retention capability with spam filter :)]]> Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:18:01 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=9426&title=email-retention-possibility#9426 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : The good news is that **IF** the...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=9023&title=email-retention-possibility#9023 Author: LogSat
Subject: 5788
Posted: 22 September 2006 at 8:13pm

The good news is that **IF** the new functionality for the retention is built, that additional functionality to allow the Bayesian filter to learn about good emails is already ready...!]]> Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:13:05 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=9023&title=email-retention-possibility#9023 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : Roberto - Getting back to the...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=9014&title=email-retention-possibility#9014 Author: RicM
Subject: 5788
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 1:18pm

Roberto -

Getting back to the original point of the thread - the retention module - and then hijacking it again...

**IF** the retention module is built, this could serve as the groundwork for submitting spam that slips through back to SpamFilterISP so the bayesian filter can learn about it...

Just a hope and a prayer...

-Ric

]]> Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:18:43 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=9014&title=email-retention-possibility#9014 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : Roberto, thanks for the clarification. Certainly...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8992&title=email-retention-possibility#8992 Author: __M__
Subject: 5788
Posted: 14 September 2006 at 8:25pm

Roberto, thanks for the clarification.

Certainly not trying to be pushy, I appreciate how important it is to not rush out a release just to please the fans.

Looking forward to seeing the result of your hardwork.

M

]]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:25:34 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8992&title=email-retention-possibility#8992 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : That's currently the functionality...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8990&title=email-retention-possibility#8990 Author: LogSat
Subject: 5788
Posted: 14 September 2006 at 4:24pm

That's currently the functionality we're working on this very week. We're trying to allow you to enable/disable the quarantine for every filter as you can now, and in addition being able to customize that for every single local domain.

A little bit more patience, we ourselves did not realize how many options we had in our own software

... and are needing to reorganize every single one so it can be customized per domain. In a few more weeks we'll have a beta out, hopefully.
]]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:24:58 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8990&title=email-retention-possibility#8990 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : Roberto, since teasing us with...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8984&title=email-retention-possibility#8984 Author: __M__
Subject: 5788
Posted: 14 September 2006 at 9:31am

Roberto, since teasing us with the main SFE features I have beenwondering if you could possibly confirm whether we will have theability to enable/disable the quarantine function for individual localdomains.

I have several domains that we don't need to quarantine the rejectedmessages for and I'd rather not clog up a MySQL database with messagesthat will never get looked at let alone released. This may be a currentfeature of SFI but I cannot see how this is currently possible.

I'll continue to haunt the LogSat website for the Beta release of SFE, I'm excited!!!!

Thanks again for your continued support of SFI.

Regards, Mike

]]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:31:48 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8984&title=email-retention-possibility#8984 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : __M__ wrote: caratking's...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8945&title=email-retention-possibility#8945 Author: WebGuyz
Subject: 5788
Posted: 08 September 2006 at 2:22pm

__M__ wrote:

caratking's in heaven! Lucky you, all I have is an erection. (But a damn good one)

You need to get out more ..

]]> Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:22:23 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8945&title=email-retention-possibility#8945 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : caratking's in heaven! Lucky...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8944&title=email-retention-possibility#8944 Author: __M__
Subject: 5788
Posted: 07 September 2006 at 9:57pm

caratking's in heaven! Lucky you, all I have is an erection. (But a damn good one)

Roberto, these proposed changes for SFE are superb and are exactly what I was hoping would come out eventually. A per-domain quarantine option would also rock. The more I use this program and the more I see of Roberto's support the more I am so pleased that I purchased this product over the others I evaluated.

Keep up the good work, I can't wait for the Beta.

]]> Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:57:17 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8944&title=email-retention-possibility#8944 <![CDATA[Email retention possibility? : Wow! I think I'm in heaven!...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8941&title=email-retention-possibility#8941 Author: caratking
Subject: 5788
Posted: 07 September 2006 at 9:18am

Wow! I think I'm in heaven!]]> Thu, 07 Sep 2006 09:18:50 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5788&PID=8941&title=email-retention-possibility#8941