Spam Filter ISP Support Forum

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - SFDC vs DCC
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

SFDC vs DCC

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
atifghaffar View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2006
Location: Switzerland
Status: Offline
Points: 104
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote atifghaffar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: SFDC vs DCC
    Posted: 07 February 2008 at 9:02am
Roberto,

Thanks for your explainations.
best regards

Atif
Back to Top
LogSat View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4065
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LogSat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 February 2008 at 4:10pm
Atif,

I did miss your other post, sorry.

We do not trust the DCC. That system only takes into consideration the number of recipients the emails are sent to. Legitimate businesses however may send out huge amount of legitimate emails. Think about Microsoft's security advisories, or legitimate newsletters. This makes the system too prone to false positives, as the more emails a single company sends, the more likely it is going to be detected to be spam. We also do not trust the "fuzziness" which the DCC uses to detect similar emails.

The SFDC not only takes into consideration the number of similar emails being reported, it also considers the IP address(es) for the mail server(s) that sent such emails. If Microsoft uses just 2 or 3 mail servers to send out 100 million emails, the SFDC will completely ignore such signatures, as they originated from only 3 different source IPs, which is way below our minimum threshold of sources. They are likely legitimate. If they're not, almost certainly another filter will have detected that only 3 IPs are generating hundreds of millions of spam emails and will stop them...
Where the SFDC will excel is in detecting spam bots, as there will be many different source IPs for each compromised bot, each spewing out a lot of emails. Those will immediately get caught in a matter of minutes.

Think of the DCC being a sled being pulled on the ground, and the SFDC being a cart with 4 actual wheels...!
Roberto Franceschetti

LogSat Software

Spam Filter ISP
Back to Top
atifghaffar View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2006
Location: Switzerland
Status: Offline
Points: 104
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote atifghaffar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 February 2008 at 7:50pm
Roberto, I asked you this question in another post but I guess it got overwhelmed by the main subject in question (grey listing). Can you plese shed some light on this now.

For the SFDC: Is is similar to DCC (http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
If yes, why re-invent it instead of implementing a dcc client in SF?

thanks.
best regards

Atif
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.152 seconds.